|
An anonymous letter from the VBI
[Note: Do not reply to this e-mail. Transmission of this message is being
provided as an anonymizing service to the VBI.]
Dear Bill Wallace, Bonnie Hitch, Rob Morse, David R. Baker and other
San Francisco reporters,
Please allow us to introduce ourselves. We are the official Volunteer
Building Inspectors (VBI), overseeing live/work loft usage in formerly
working-class San Francisco neighborhoods. (See the Aug. 18 Chronicle
article for more.)
We have waited a month since word of our action got out to see if, in
response, the Department of Building Inspection would start doing its
job. But alas it has not, and the live/work rip-off continues. So now,
since the City wants to prosecute us, we will turn ourselves in.
But first, some background on VBI.
As we are sure you are aware, the great majority of the live/work loft
units in San Francisco are in flagrant violation of City law.
(Specifically, Section 102.13 of the San Francisco Municipal Code,
passed in 1988 to protect artists living in their work spaces, and
stating that "a live/work unit is a structure... with an integrated
work space principally used by one or more of the residents"--NOT a
market-rate apartment for wealthy dot-commers.)
What's more, the residents of these sham artist spaces are exempted
from paying school development fees, from having to provide 10% of units
as low-income housing, and from various costly construction restrictions,
all of which would apply to normal residential apartments.
The City has thus created a growing class of rich people who do not pay
their taxes, and who give nothing to the community in which they live...
because they are PRETENDING TO BE ARTISTS. They are ROBBING millions of
dollars in school taxes and low-income support from the City, while the
real artists (who DO pay their taxes) are displaced to make way for the
wealthy.
Exasperated citizens that we are, we decided to do the City a favor:
since City officials are clearly not doing their job, we tried to at
least make it LOOK like they were doing their job.
We meant it as a favor to you as well. We know it's hard to write stories
about important issues when politicians refuse to provide lively quotes.
Since almost no San Francisco politician besides Ammiano wants to discuss
the FAKE ARTISTS milking the city for millions through the live/work loft
scam, it's been very difficult for you to write stories about it. So we
brought you something better than a quote: we brought you CRIME!
But whose?
Prosecute us for forgery for obvious political speech? Nail us for
"defacing" property that stands in blatant violation of City law? How
complex, how confusing!
On the other hand, the law concerning live/work lofts is CLEAR and
UNAMBIGUOUS, and all live/work developers and almost all new live/work
residents are violating it.
So, to determine whose crimes are real, we make the City an offer:
inspect the live/work lofts for violations of the City's municipal code,
and we will TURN OURSELVES IN. We will VOLUNTEER to be prosecuted to the
full extent of the law.
This is a great deal for the City: they get to nab an underground
collective of criminal property defacers and forgers with no effort or
taxpayer expense, and all they have to do in return is THE JOB THEY ARE
SUPPOSED TO DO ANYWAY.
We will watch the news for a reply. Meanwhile, we will keep making the
City look as if it were doing its job.
Until soon, we remain sincerely yours,
P.S. The Aug. 18 Chronicle article can be found at
sfgate.com.
Section 102.13 of the San Francisco Municipal Code can be found at
the city web site.
And more information can be found at SaveSanFrancisco.org
(with whom we are in no way associated).
P.P.S. While Rich Rovetti thinks that our notices were put up with "some
kind of adhesive cement," they were in fact done with regular old wheat
paste, the same stuff behind almost every other poster in our city.
|
Last updated: 10 February 2001 |
Send comments
or questions by email. |
|