WTO
  HomeAbout the WTOSite MapSearchRegister your questions
 

Trade Topics:

Globalization: A Solution For Some
The Media Fund
The Intellectual Property Fund
The Environment Fund
The Biological Property Fund
The Emerging Communications Fund
The Frontier Fund
The Corporate Law Fund
The Labor Fund
The Education Fund
The Net Fund
The High Risk Fund
The Magic Christian Fund
The Health Fund
QuickTips

Resources:

Back to WTO Ministerials
The Yes Men impersonate the WTO
The Archimedes Project
Voteauction.com
Back to The etoy Fund
Partial anti-eToys timeline
Le fonds etoy
NSI and www.etoy.com
Jan. 25 press release
eToys wins game
Dec. 29 press release
Back to A press conference in Los Angeles
'The Dot.comedy of the eToystory'
A statement by Amy Alexander (open)
One participant's description
Dec. 24 press release
A press conference in New York
A threat from someone at eToys
We brought down www.eToys.com!
Dec. 12 press release
Campaigns and resources
Articles about eToys vs. etoy
Corporate aggression and the internet
Autodesk, the legacy of eToys
The Presidential Exploratory Committee
The World Trade Organization
Deconstructing Beck
Phone in Sick Day (Mayday)
The Secret Writer's Society hack
Popotla vs. Titanic
The Barbie Liberation Organization
The SimCopter hack
The Zapatista Floodnet
The Threat of Millennium
Project LOFT (Art Inspection)
Other past projects
Articles without project focus
Selected archive of recent press
A few ongoing projects
On-line Bookshop
Written materials
Legal Texts
Archive of recent press
Translations of our materials
Technical Cooperation
PowerPoint discourses
Links to like-minded sites
Frequently Asked Questions
Images for viewing and publication
The need for the mutual fund model
Becoming an investor

A statement by Amy Alexander

(Amy Alexander, at the Dec. 27 press conference. Alexander is a widely-exhibited film, video, and animation artist on the faculty of the California Institute of the Arts; among her best-known works is Plagiarist.org.)

My name used to be Amy Alexander.

But today I know that as an individual with little recourse to vast sums of money for lawyers’ fees my name is no longer guaranteed or protected.

I am an artist and a faculty member at California Institute of the Arts. However, today I am speaking for myself, not for calarts.edu, etoy.com, etoys.com, dupont.com, nor for any other .coms, .edus, .nets, or .orgs.

In early 1999 I made a web-based art project in which I parodied massive corporate takeovers by pretending to take over 27 of the world's largest corporations. This was an art project: it was ironic, it was a parody, and it was funny.

But because it mentioned the *names* of corporations my employer and I and were sent notification to cease and desist by the DuPont Company--dupont.com--and I was forced at that time to remove my project from the internet.

In addition, DuPont faxed a stack of papers to my employer, including some which, among other things, seemed to imply that I had made death threats against the public relations director of the Jewish Defense League. This was obviously not the case. My work has never contained any material of a threatening, violent, nor even remotely anti-Semitic nature.

It reminds me of a similar tactic that eToys Corporation appears to be taking, in implying that a group of young European artists promote hacking, pornography and the Oklahoma bombing terrorists.

These tactics of threatening and intimidating artists, who have very limited financial resources, have been used by corporations dozens of times in the past few years, since corporations began to silence the work of artists on the web.

Corporations such as Mattel, American express, and 7-11 have successfully removed the work of internationally known and respected artists from the web.

But in this case, I think it’s even more outrageous: Etoy the art group did not appropriate the name of Etoys corporation. Etoy the art group had the name first. And this name is being taken away from them.... and etoy is forced to pay lawyer’s fees that it can not afford.

So, we’re here as artists and individuals to say this is not fair, this is not democratic; what this is, is theft.

This is a cheap shot made by a wealthy corporation to silence individuals who have a right to speak and to express themselves...

These individuals, these artists, are being silenced because the corporations have more money for lawyers than individuals do.

Corporations do not have the right to censor individuals, and so, we’re here today to make sure that this doesn't happen. It’s a big Internet; there’s enough room for everyone - not just for whomever has the most lawyers.

Thanks--from the artist formerly known as Amy.


Last updated:
10 February 2001
Send comments or
questions by email.

kill your tv dot com